|
A Christmas Carol
December
12, 2004
Rev.
Larry Smith
“Marley
was dead: to begin with.”1
Those are the first words in Charles Dickens’ story A
Christmas Carol. Charles
Dickens liked dramatic and unusual opening lines to all of his
stories. Who,
after all, can forget the opening words to A Tale of Two
Cities, “It was the best of times; it was the worst of
times?” The
beginning to A Christmas Carol though, introduces us to
a ghost story. We
need to know that Jacob Marley, Ebenezer Scrooge’s business
partner is long dead and buried.
The stage is set for night-time visits by spirits that
walk the earth.
A
Christmas Carol is probably the second most popular
Christmas story in the English language, being trumped
possibly only by the story given in the Christian Gospel.
And who does not know the story of A Christmas Carol?
If the story is
unfamiliar to you then I have to wonder how far your home
world is from our solar system.
The actors who have portrayed Scrooge on television,
stage and screen are legion.
I’ve even seen a Bugs Bunny version of A Christmas
Carol. Hollywood
and Broadway milk this story every year.
In
a real way though, a discrete subtext underlies this story
about ghostly visitations and Ebenezer Scrooge.
Dickens wrote the story about Ebenezer Scrooge at a
very important turning point in his life.
A few years earlier his wife’s sister had died and
Dickens’ subsequent grief caused him to venture on a
religious journey. In
1842 he traveled to the United States.
Dickens hoped to find progressive religious bodies
freed from state control.
Then, as now, that is hardly the case.
He discovered that the churches in this country at that
time were hardly any more broad-minded than the ones in
Europe. He noted
though that one denomination was markedly different – the
Unitarians. In the United States he met with Unitarian ministers and
decided to attend a Unitarian church when he returned back to
England.
In
1843 Charles Dickens started attending the Little Portland
Street Chapel, a Unitarian congregation in London.
He began writing letters about his new-found faith to
his friends in the United States and in Britain.
He wrote that his friend the English Unitarian
minister, Edward Taggert, had “that religion which has
sympathy for men of every creed and ventures to pass judgment
on none.” Writing
to an American friend Dickens said, “I have carried into
effect an old idea of mine and joined the Unitarians, who
would do something for human improvement if they could; and
practice charity and toleration.”
Therein
lies the heart, the spirit of Dickens’ story, A Christmas
Carol. Dickens
wrote his story about Scrooge when he was at the height of his
enthusiasm and activity in the Unitarian church on Little
Portland Street. Therefore,
I believe that this story is a revelation of nineteenth
century Unitarianism.
A
Christmas Carol is a story about Christmas but little
mention is made of the story in the Bible.
Were you to thumb through A Christmas Carol you
would find no specific mention of the birth of Jesus or any
theological interpretations.
Two passages do allude to events from scripture but
they are not packed with theological importance.
Tiny Tim likes to go to church and mentions that he
hopes that his lame body will remind others of “him who made
lame beggars walk and the blind to see.” 2
Yes, Tiny Tim does bespeak of miracles but the importance to
us, the readers, is that though we cannot perform miracles or
feats of similar wonder, we do have the capacity to care for
the sick and the poor. We do have the capacity for compassion.
That
is the underlying assumption in A Christmas Carol.
The nineteenth century Unitarians did not believe
in any specific religious doctrine but they did believe that
religion was more about living than believing.
The nineteenth century Unitarians were well-known in
their time for their catch-phrase, “Deeds not creeds.”
They found that many people believed in religious ideas
but had little interest in how one’s beliefs influenced
their lives or the lives they lived with others.
In other words, one can subscribe to all the
traditional creeds in Christendom and still be a thoroughly
rotten person--or a true saint.
The
nineteenth century Unitarians believed that Christianity was
more important as a religion about living a generous and
charitable life than it was a religion about particular
religious doctrines. They
subscribed to Christian ethics in the belief that the ministry
of Jesus was to care for others.
Their religion was about ethics.
Elaine
Pagels is a Harvard University professor specializing in the
early Christian scriptures.
Her books like The Gnostic Gospels and Adam,
Eve and the Serpent have made the best-seller lists over
the past ten years. Elaine
Pagels has had a similar revelation after pouring over early
Christian texts for decades.
She believes that early Christianity was less a
religion about belief than it was about a new way of being.
It
is just such a new way of being that we witness in Charles
Dickens’ A Christmas Carol.
Like most of Dickens’ stories A Christmas
Carol is about society and ethics. It’s about the rich and the poor, the haves and the
have-nots.
The
story begins with Ebenezer Scrooge encountering his nephew who
arrives at his firm on Christmas Eve to wish him a merry
Christmas. Scrooge
dismisses Christmas with a “Bah, humbug!”
Scrooge’s nephew defends Christmas thus:
There
are many things from which I might have derived good, by which
I have not profited, I dare say . . . Christmas among the
rest. But I am
sure I have always thought of Christmas time, when it has come
round–apart from the veneration due to its sacred name and
origin, if anything belonging to it can be apart from
that–as a good time: a kind, forgiving, charitable, pleasant
time: the only time I know of, in the long calendar year, when
men and women seem by one consent to open their shut-up hearts
freely, and to think the people below them as if they were
really fellow-passengers to the grave, and not another race of
creatures bound on other journeys.
And therefore, uncle, though it has never put a scrap
of gold or silver in my pocket, I believe that it has
done me good, and will do me good; and I say, God bless
it!3
After
his nephew leaves two men arrive collecting money for the
poor. Scrooge
dismisses them as well, saying that he does not need to give
to the poor because there are enough prisons and workhouses to
take care of their needs.
He dismisses them summarily.
Later
that evening Scrooge is visited by the ghost of his business
partner, Jacob Marley. Marley’s
ghostly form is covered by chains that he drags along.
Attached to Marley’s chains are “cash-boxes, keys,
padlocks, ledgers, deeds and heavy purses wrought in steel,”4
representing the things Marley placed value to when he lived
and are now burdens upon his spirit.
We
learn through their conversation that Marley and Scrooge were
cast from the same mold.
And what is that mold?
They both valued only money, security.
They never shared their wealth with anyone, nor did it
really ever bring any joy to each of them. They led lives of miserable disconnection from their fellow
humans.
Marley
explains to Scrooge that he has arranged for three ghosts to
visit him on Christmas Eve.
Marley explains to Scrooge that this will happen so
Scrooge will not make the mistakes that Marley did when he
lived.
The
first ghost, the spirit of Christmas past, takes Scrooge to
Christmas seasons of his youth and young adulthood.
Scrooge is presented as a poor young man with a sickly
but happy sister. He
sees himself as a young apprentice at a great Christmas party
hosted by his employer. In
Christmas past, Scrooge was happy.
Then
with the spirit of Christmas present, Scrooge visits the homes
of many across the world and discovers the connections that
the season brings. He
visits the home of his nephew and finds his nephew defending
his mean, old uncle against the complaints of the rest of the
family. He visits
the home of his employee, Bob Cratchitt and learns of the
spirit of Tiny Tim. Instead
of being bitter and withdrawn about his disability, Tiny Tim
sees in it the possibility of connection with others.
So filled with love is he that he proclaims, “God
bless us, everyone!”
With
the third spirit, the spirit of Christmas future, Scrooge
learns that he and Tiny Tim are fated to die soon.
He travels to a crime den and discovers that in his
death the only people who have much to say about him are the
women who steel his property when they discover his dead body.
At
the end of the book Scrooge awakes on Christmas day and
reclaims his life. He
sends a turkey to Bob Cratchitt’s house, gives money for the
poor and attends his nephew’s Christmas supper.
He is a changed man.
What has happened?
The
nineteenth century Unitarians believed that human beings were
innately good. Scrooge,
through life in the counting house, has become more and more
divorced from his connections with humanity.
He can see human beings only in economic terms and has
forgotten the love and care and connections which were also
part of his own past. He
has closed himself off from the joy and the suffering of
humanity. He
possesses wealth but takes no real benefit from it because his
love of it and unwillingness to part with it separates him
from all the emotions involved with human beings.
By
appealing to his memories, the noble feelings that his fellow
men had for him–even in his stinginess, and ultimately with
his inevitable mortality, Scrooge is forced to recognize that
he does care about others as much as he has been cared for by
them in the past. He
is forced to recognize that his love of money blinds him to
the suffering of others.
In
a sense, we are all at risk of becoming Ebenezer Scrooge.
With a mobile and technological culture, with a nation
covered by suburbs without sidewalks or front porches, with a
national philosophy that emphasizes rugged individualism more
than community, we are at risk of becoming like Scrooge.
We are always at risk that our personal concerns, our
narcissistic tendencies, will take over and we will lose the
ability even to communicate meaningfully with each other or
even understand how others live.
The
nineteenth century Unitarians believed that human nature was
innately good. They
also believed that the technological innovations of their era,
the new industrial society, were breaking apart the
connections that had existed in British society for centuries.
One of their guiding concerns was for education about
the ills of society. They felt that if everyone knew about the poverty in
industrial revolution Britain, that the good in human nature
would be appealed to and that society might change. Unitarians
believed that if mill owners knew about conditions for mill
workers, and as Scrooge’s nephew put it about Christmastide,
“. . . to open their shut-up hearts freely, and to think the
people below them as if they were really fellow-passengers to
the grave, and not another race of creatures bound on other
journeys,”5 that they would care
about the Tiny Tims of the world.
Today
the Cratchitts of the world are still with us.
We may think that our fellow humans are distinct
creatures, so different from ourselves that we have nothing in
common. Yet,
whether it is acknowledged or not, every child born has a
father and mother. Every
person knows joys and sorrows.
Were we to walk invisibly like Scrooge through the
homes of other people the world round we would discover the
fullness of the human condition – singing and dancing like
Scrooge’s nephew to the beats of African drums, Asian flutes
and Andean pipes-- sorrows at the loss of children and close
friends and lovers. We
would find in equal measure in the homes of the rich and the
poor a share of fools and sages, kindness and coldness,
intelligence and stupidity, happiness and misery.
Were we but able to walk with a spirit guide through
such places we would know that though we are not all alike, we
are still all human. In
the words of Chief Seattle, “what befalls one, befalls
all.”
In
Dickens’ native Britain, this message was late in coming.
During the Second World War middle-class and
upper-class Britons were exposed to the harsh realities of
working class life when children were evacuated from the
tenements and slums of their great industrial cities.
The people who learned about the lives working class
children really lived were shocked and their compassion was so
stirred that they moved their government in the post war years
to create programs that would make better the lives of the
most desperate class of Britons.
Contact with others stirred British compassion.
It
is sad that this season is a time only for a moment in the
headlong rush of our lives.
We hope not to become as separated as Scrooge from
human contact. We
long to find the redemptive spirit of generosity as Scrooge
later did. We
hope that we will have the spirit of connection to care for
each other and the planet we live upon in all our days, that
the natural connections between people will not be packed away
with the twinkling Christmas tree light–only to be unpacked
next year.
The
African-American theologian Howard Thurman characterized our
needs as the “work of Christmas”:
When
the song of the angels is stilled,
When
the star in the sky is gone,
When
the kings and the princes are home,
When
the shepherds are back with their flocks,
The
work of Christmas begins:
To
find the lost,
To
heal the broken,
To
feed the hungry,
To
release the prisoner,
To
rebuild the nations,
To
bring peace among brothers,
To
make music in the heart.6
Could
we hope for anything more?
Everyday we are at risk of becoming the worst of
Scrooge and the best as well.
Whether we live the spirit of Christmas in the seasons
to come is up to our generosity and connections with life on
this planet. Dickens
tells us that Scrooge was a changed man from his Christmas
encounter and that he made Christmas a central nexus of his
life thereafter.
The
truth is that we are all like Scrooge.
We are all mortal and when we think of death it is
common to think of the things we have contributed to humanity.
Some people are gifted with the ability to lead others
to the good. Others
have generosity of spirit that lives on
and sustains their families and friends.
All cannot give of their lives great things like curing
diseases or writing great poetry to last the ages. But
whatever good we can do here and now, it is our blessing and
our opportunity to do it.
Unitarian Universalism believes that human beings
through recognizing our interconnections can build a better
world and that it is our duty to try to do just that. As
Dickens said of Unitarians about one hundred sixty years ago,
we can still be people “who would do something for human
improvement if they could; and practice charity and
toleration.”
Please
indulge me today as I end this discourse on A Christmas
Carol and Unitarianism by sharing with you the ending of
the story.
Scrooge
was better than his word.
He did it all, and infinitely more; and to Tiny Tim,
who did NOT die, he became a second father. He became as good a friend, as good a master, and as good a
man, as the good old city knew, or any good old city, town, or
borough, in the good old world.
Some people laughed to see the alteration in him, but
he let them laugh, and little heeded them; for he was wise
enough to know that nothing happened on this globe, for good,
at which some people did not have their fill of laughter in
the outset; and knowing that such as these would be blind
anyway, he thought it quite as well that they should wrinkle
up their eyes in grins, as have the malady in less attractive
forms. His own
heart laughed: and that was quite enough for him.
He
had no intercourse with Spirits . . . and it was always said
of him, that he knew how to keep Christmas well, if man alive
possessed the knowledge.
May that be truly said of us, and all of us!
And so, as Tiny Tim observed, God bless Us, Every One!7
May
we keep Christmas in our hearts when this season is passed.
May we work for human improvement to the best of our
ability. May we
continue to practice charity and toleration.
May we make music in the hearts of the world.
In faith, in hope, in love.
Amen.
1
Dickens, Charles, A Christmas Carol, in The
Christmas Books. (NY,
NY: Penguin Classics, 1985.)
45.
2
Ibid, 94.
7
Dickens, Charles, A Christmas Carol in The
Christmas Books. (NY,
NY: Penguin Classics.)
Copyright
Larry Smith
|